This blog post examines the grounds for why humans should be recognized as equal beings, delving deeply into the differences between Rawls’ concept of moral personhood and Singer’s notion of the capacity for consideration of interests, and the debates they generate. Equality, alongside freedom, has become a core ideology of modern society. Humans are considered equal regardless...
This blog post examines why Kant’s external proposition, by undermining both the categorical and hypothetical nature of legal norms, paradoxically complicates the conditions for establishing legal commands. Ethical norms and legal norms are similar in that they do not merely describe what actions are required of humans, but possess a prescriptive character that directs individuals...
This blog post examines the contrasting interpretations of the American Revolution offered by innovationism, consensus historiography, and New Left historiography, exploring how conflict and consensus operated simultaneously. As the United States moved beyond an agrarian society and underwent rapid industrialization and urbanization in the late 19th century, various conflicts erupted...
This blog post examines the criteria a judge should use when legal conscience and moral judgment clash, exploring how judicial legitimacy and democratic values achieve balance. The question of whether sincerity is required of judges is under discussion. Modern democratic states grant enforceability to judges’ rulings, yet simultaneously demand that rulings state their reasons to...
This blog post examines, from an omics research perspective, how protein combinations change as cells differentiate and how these changes relate to the functions of biological systems and the onset of disease. One of the core keywords in modern life sciences is omics. Unlike past life science research focused on analyzing the function and structure of individual genes and proteins, omics...
This blog post examines how the limitations of legal wording and the scope of judicial discretion collide and harmonize, presenting a perspective that offers a balanced understanding of the tension between democratic legitimacy and purpose rationality. A long-standing debate exists over whether legal interpretation must be strictly bound by the text. Some affirm such binding, arguing that...
This blog post examines the intellectual evolution and historical context that led Greek intellectuals under Roman rule to progress from compliance and compromise toward eventual assimilation. In the mid-2nd century CE, Aristides, a Greek from a Roman province, delivered the Oration Against Rome, a speech describing the characteristics of Roman rule. This text holds particular significance...
This blog post examines how advances in science and technology influence legal judgments and why scientific techniques like radiocarbon dating are becoming increasingly important as evidence, using specific examples. As science and technology rapidly advance and their influence expands into various aspects of daily life, the need for expert scientific knowledge in courtrooms is steadily...
This blog post examines how the risk premium—the reward for accepting risk—changes investor choices and portfolio composition, and how it redefines the balance between profitability and stability. In economics, the composition of various financial assets held by an individual is called a portfolio. Each asset possesses unique characteristics related to profitability, risk, and liquidity...
This blog post examines the asymmetry between the happiness and pain brought by childbirth from a philosophical perspective, deeply exploring how the ethical meaning differs between what exists and what does not. Marriage often leads naturally to having children, yet children may suffer harm by being born into this world. They may contract unwanted illnesses or endure the hardships of...